![]() ![]() what exactly means "we have", "finished", "passed hash check" (especially why "we have", "finished" are contrasted in comments like "returns true if all blocks in this piece are finished or if we have the piece"). For example, I can't understand the clear difference between the states of a piece, i.e. I am really confused by the logic of accounting of downloaded data and the terminology used. En ESTE VDEO informativo te muestro como aumentar la velocidad al mximo de uTorrent.Mejor configuracin. According to comment in the code torrent_status.num_pieces is equivalent to std::accumulate(pieces->begin(), pieces->end()) but actually torrent_status.pieces is obtained differently: IIRC, pieces take into account the pieces that have passed the hash check, while num_pieces takes into account the pieces that we "have".torrent_status.total_wanted_done >= torrent_status.total_wanted but torrent_status.num_pieces is less than total number of pieces). How come the ETA for the highlighted uTorrent download is at infinity As you can see, the download is in full progress, size is 388 MB and almost 52 done. Regardless of 100%+ progress the torrent still doesn't "have" all the pieces (i.e.torrent_status.state is neither finished nor seeding). Regardless of 100%+ progress the torrent is still marked as Downloading (i.e.According to screenshot from this comment, there is still possible to get incorrect progress from libtorrent.It’s quickly gaining popularity among the users. However, I was able to find some inconsistencies that could serve as an impetus for you to perform your own investigations. With a black-colored theme, Veoble is also ranked among the powerful torrent search engine sites that you’d find on the web. Recently I tried to investigate the libtorrent code, but I still couldn't put this puzzle into the whole picture. Maybe the fact my torrents and AVI files are being stored remotely is part of the problem? If there is any hiccup in storing data remotely, maybe qbittorrent is not handling the error condition well and I don't have time to do large-scale testing with debugging of this problem to provide a lot of data. Im not sure if uTorrents initial-seed system has the same mechanisms. BitTornados super-seed system has mechanisms in place to deal with multiple seeds already on the torrent or when new seeds come in. In other words I have one Mac which acts as a central file server for all Macs in the house, including my qbittorrent mac. Initial seeding is intended to improve distribution during the initial stages of a torrent. in my case I am running qbittorrent on a Mac but all my storage locations are on another Mac I am accessing via a wired Ethernet connection using SMB (standard Mac networking). Sometimes this can be fixed by pausing and resuming, but usually I have to exit qbittorrent and restart to get them to not be stalled. The symptom is that there are many active Seeds and many active Peers, but 0 Down Speed and Status is Stalled. Although the length of time that you should leave the file seeding is not defined, it is recommended. So once the downloading of torrent job finishes, and thereafter you leave the torrent job seeding, it uploads the file (s) to other peers so they can enjoy them too. I get downloads randomly stalling (often when they are first added to qbittorrent, but sometimes after they have downloaded some portion already). uTorrent Seeding meaning is sharing a file or multiple files with other peers.Stopping and restarting qbittorrent usually (always?) causes these torrents to either recheck or download a last few bytes (not sure which action is happening - it is too quick) then complete successfully and switch to seeding. This process is completely safe as you’ve already downloaded your file, and it won’t disappear from your computer. That way, you’ll break the connection with the server, and you’ll stop seeding from your computer. Pausing and resuming does not seem to help. All you have to do is right-click on your file and choose Stop. I also get a nice log of all state changes.I am having the same problem as well, running qbittorrent 4.0.4, but there are 2 symptoms: That is, when a download finishes seeding, I get an invocation of the script that can then remove the file. When your client says seeding, it is waiting for other users to. That plus the removal of my settings.dat files has found me a combination that seems to work without error. Your torrent client should say Seeding in the status column after the download completes. Haven't had a chance to look at either of these problems further, but I switched to using the state change script instead of the finished script.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |